Sunday, November 17, 2013

Brainbow


Figure 1
In 2007 the world changed. In a research laboratory someone in the state of Masachussets, Harvard scientists devised a way to color mouse neurons to help them trace the neuron’s long and intricate arms. Their results became what is now known as the Brainbow effect.
With the help of at least 3 different fluorescent proteins, scientists were able to paint neurons in a variety of different colors making the tracing of neurons much simpler. This tracing has helped the phenomena known as brain mapping.
Figure 2

Earlier this year, in his state of the union address, President Obama talked about the importance of the mapping of the brain. Brainbow, has significantly helped the progress of brain mapping but there are those that oppose it.

Figure 3
Just as the controversy the Human Genome Project received, brain mapping has created disputes between scientists because of the involvement of the government. Some scientists believe structuring and in a way limiting the way scientists work in order to gain results is counter-productive.

This idea of how scientists should work is very interesting since it relates directly to artists. In many ways, Brainbow has opened the door to a discussion on how scientists should be allowed to work. Scientists like artists want to be free of the chains an institutionalized world forces them to work in. Scientists, like artists want to have their own creative control.



Resources
"Brainbow." Center for Brain Science. Harvard University. Web. 18 Nov 2013. <http://cbs.fas.harvard.edu/science/connectome-project/brainbow>.

Hayman, John. "Art and Neurosciene." queens.ox.ac.uk. University of Oxford , Oxford UK, n.d. Web. 18 Nov 2013. <http://www.queens.ox.ac.uk/academics/hyman/files/art_and_neuroscience.pdf>.

Greenwood, Veronique. Fly Over the 'Brainbow'. 2011. Photograph. MIT Technology ReviewWeb. 18 Nov 2013. <http://www.technologyreview.com/photogallery/423111/fly-over-the-brainbow/>.

NPR STAFF. "Somewhere Over The Brainbow: The Journey To Map the Human Brain." NPR. 31 Mar 2013: n. page. Web. 18 Nov. 2013. <http://www.npr.org/2013/03/31/175858397/somewhere-over-the-brainbow-the-journey-to-map-the-human-brain>.

Reueller, Peter. “‘Brainbow,’ version 2.0.” Harvard Gazette. 15 May 2013 Harvard University. Web. 18 Nov. 2013 <http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2013/05/brainbow-version-2-0/>

Images

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Art for the Elite

Fig. 1
In Meanings of participation: Outlaw Biology? Chris Kelty states, “…the Victorian Gentleman
Scientist is neither outside nor within the system, but above it. His view on things is that of the aesthete and the discriminating intellectual…Artists are more likely to be Victorian Gentleman than hackers and outlaws…” Kelty gives an artist the term Victorian Gentleman Scientist and labels an artist above the system of biology.

The problem with this idea is that it gives artists the immunity to do what they want when dealing with complex biological structures because they are “above the system.”

Why is this a problem?

When artists are removed from the system art becomes an exclusive media, only attainable by those that are highly educated. In addition, claiming that an artist is above the system only removes the artist from any blame they may receive.

Fig. 2
Take as an example the Central American artist Guillermo Habacuc Vargas. Vargas tied up a severely malnourished and starving dog and instructed visitors to his gallery that the dog would not be fed. After some visitors objected to the artist’s demands, Vargas remained unmoved and the dog stayed without eating until he died later that night.

An art piece such as this is not only extreme but severely hurtful to the connections between artists and the general population.

However, besides Vargas’s inappropriate use of a starving dog as a showpiece, it seems that most artists don’t cross this inhumane line and if they do their actions aren’t very deleterious.

Marta de Menezes, by using a thin needle coupled to a heat generator, was able to create unique wing patters on butterflies never before seen in nature.


Menezes’s butterfly project differs from Varagas’s showcase because she handled the complex biological structures she worked with in a humane manner.

Fig. 3
The danger all artists face when they are working with complex biological structures is not having a purpose and not communicating that purpose effectively.

What was the point of Menezes butterfly project?

The moment that an artist loses its audience, that is the moment when bio art becomes unethical.
Artists should do a better job of breaking down their complex ideas by communicating them to the public with minimal jargon. It’s time to open up the art world to everyone.


Resources

HamdenRice, . "Artist ties up dog in gallery, let's it starve to death while gallery goers watch (warning: graphic)."Artist ties up dog in gallery, let's it starve to death while gallery goers watch (warning: graphic). Democratic Underground, 23 Mar 2008. Web. 10 Nov 2013. <http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3049666>.

Martha de Menezes. Martha de Menezes. Moshi Moshi. Web. 10 Nov 2013. <http://martademenezes.com/>.


School of Visual Arts. Visual Arts Press. Web. 10 Nov 2013. <http://www.sva.edu/special-programs/summer-residency-programs/bio-art>

Vranich, Dr. Belisa. "Dr. Belisa Vranich: The Starving Dog Artist: A Diagnosis ." Huffington Post Healthy Living. Huffington Post, 20 Apr 2008. Web. 10 Nov 2013. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/belisa-vranich/the-starving-dog-artist-a_b_97512.html>.

Images

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3